From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wy-Tex Corp. v. McCullough

Supreme Court of Wyoming
Mar 3, 1936
54 P.2d 895 (Wyo. 1936)

Opinion

No. 1904

March 3, 1936

APPEAL AND ERROR — MANDATORY STATUTE — JURISDICTION — DISMISSAL.

1. The statute (Sec. 89-4904 R.S.) requiring record on appeal to be filed within seventy (70) days after entry of the judgment appealed from, unless extended by order, is jurisdictional, the statute being mandatory and not directory. 2. Where record on appeal from judgment entered June 16, 1934 was not filed in the office of the Clerk of the Trial Court until September 10, 1934, the appeal must be dismissed.

APPEAL FROM the District Court of Weston County; HARRY P. ILSLEY, Judge.

For the plaintiff and appellant there was a brief and oral argument by P.J. Gallagher of Portland, Oregon.

For the defendant and respondent there was a brief by Dan M. McCutcheon of Belle Fourche, South Dakota, and E.E. Wakeman of Newcastle, Wyoming, and oral argument by Mr. McCutcheon.


This case was undertaken to be brought to this Court by the direct appeal method of appellate procedure. The record submitted shows the judgment appealed from was entered on the journal of the district court of Weston County, where the case was pending and had been tried, on June 16, 1934. The record on appeal in the cause was not filed in the office of the Clerk of said Court until, as the certificate of the Clerk states, September 10, 1934. This was beyond the period of seventy days after the entry of the judgment appealed from allowed by law for making this filing. (Section 89-4904 W.R.S. 1931.) The submitted record establishes also that no order extending the time for complying with this statutory requirement was made. It has been settled by many decisions of this Court that filing the record in the time after the entry of the judgment appealed from, as prescribed by Section 89-4904, supra, is jurisdictional, that section of the statute being mandatory and not directory. Goodrich v. Big Horn County Bank, 26 Wyo. 42, 174 P. 191, 26 Wyo. 492, 188 P. 36; Coffee v. Harris, 27 Wyo. 494, 199 P. 931; Berry v. Sample, 28 Wyo. 272, 203 P. 257; Peterson v. Spaugh, 31 Wyo. 26, 222 P. 580; State v. Kelly, 33 Wyo. 420, 240 P. 207; Scott v. Wyoming Rock Products Co., 37 Wyo. 527, 264 P. 86; Woodruff v. Cokeville Light Power Co., 38 Wyo. 70, 264 P. 704; Barnett v. Bankers' Finance Association, 38 Wyo. 511, 268 P. 1025; Electrolytic Copper Co. v. Board of County Commissioner of Albany County, 42 Wyo. 67, 289 P. 1096; Wolfe v. Carrels, 47 Wyo. 334, 37 P.2d 68. The cause must be dismissed.

Additionally we may say that our examination of the record leads us to conclude that there was not only substantial evidence to sustain the judgment of the trial court (Huber v. Glenrock State Bank, 32 Wyo. 357, 376, 234 P. 31), but we think the trial court by that judgment disposed of the matters urged here very satisfactorily, and were a dismissal not necessary, an affirmance would be.

DISMISSED.

KIMBALL, CH. J. and BLUME, J., concur.


Summaries of

Wy-Tex Corp. v. McCullough

Supreme Court of Wyoming
Mar 3, 1936
54 P.2d 895 (Wyo. 1936)
Case details for

Wy-Tex Corp. v. McCullough

Case Details

Full title:WY-TEX CORPORATION v. McCULLOUGH

Court:Supreme Court of Wyoming

Date published: Mar 3, 1936

Citations

54 P.2d 895 (Wyo. 1936)
54 P.2d 895

Citing Cases

Chadwick v. Nagel

POINTS OF COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT ON MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL This court has held in numerous cases that…

Whipps et al. v. Town of Greybull

Faulkner v. Faulkner, 27 Wyo. 62; Holliday v. Bundy, 42 Wyo. 61; Hahn v. Bank, 25 Wyo. 467. The following…