From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wunner v. Zayas

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 16, 2022
21 CV 1865 (VB) (S.D.N.Y. May. 16, 2022)

Opinion

21 CV 1865 (VB)

05-16-2022

JONTE ANDREW WUNNER, Plaintiff, v. SERGEANT C. ZAYAS, SERGEANT M. SHENE, CORPORAL J. WILCOX, DEPUTY M. GORR, and DEPUTY SAWALL, Defendants.


ORDER

VINCENT L. BRICCETTI, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff, who is incarcerated and proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, moves for appointment of counsel. (Doc. #56).

The motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to renewal.

The Court has considered the type and complexity of this case, the merits of plaintiffs claims, and plaintiffs ability to present the case. The Court, in its discretion, does not find exceptional circumstances in plaintiffs case warranting the appointment of counsel at this time. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1); Cooper v. A. Sargenti Co, , 877 F.2d 170, 172 (2d Cir. 1989). Accordingly, plaintiffs request is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for renewal at an appropriate time in the future.

The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962).

Chambers will mail a copy of this Order to plaintiff at the address on the docket.

SO ORDERED:


Summaries of

Wunner v. Zayas

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 16, 2022
21 CV 1865 (VB) (S.D.N.Y. May. 16, 2022)
Case details for

Wunner v. Zayas

Case Details

Full title:JONTE ANDREW WUNNER, Plaintiff, v. SERGEANT C. ZAYAS, SERGEANT M. SHENE…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: May 16, 2022

Citations

21 CV 1865 (VB) (S.D.N.Y. May. 16, 2022)