From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wulstein v. Wulstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 1, 1922
202 App. Div. 849 (N.Y. App. Div. 1922)

Summary

In Wulstein v. Wulstein (202 A.D. 849) the Appellate Division, Second Department, reversed an order of the Special Term, granting a new trial "on the ground that defendant's motion for a new trial was not made within the time limited to take an appeal from the judgment, as provided in section 1002 of the Code of Civil Procedure, or section 552 of the Civil Practice Act, and that the court at Special Term was without power to extend the time so limited."

Summary of this case from Landon v. Frank Improvement Co., Inc.

Opinion

July, 1922.


Order reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, on the ground that defendant's motion for a new trial was not made within the time limited to take an appeal from the judgment as provided in section 1002 of the Code of Civil Procedure, or section 552 of the Civil Practice Act, and that the court at Special Term was without power to extend the time so limited. This reversal, however, is made without prejudice to defendants' right to move for a new trial upon newly-discovered evidence, or to make such a motion in this court upon exceptions pursuant to section 1001 of the Code of Civil Procedure and section 551 of the Civil Practice Act. Blackmar, P.J., Kelly, Jaycox, Kelby and Young, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Wulstein v. Wulstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 1, 1922
202 App. Div. 849 (N.Y. App. Div. 1922)

In Wulstein v. Wulstein (202 A.D. 849) the Appellate Division, Second Department, reversed an order of the Special Term, granting a new trial "on the ground that defendant's motion for a new trial was not made within the time limited to take an appeal from the judgment, as provided in section 1002 of the Code of Civil Procedure, or section 552 of the Civil Practice Act, and that the court at Special Term was without power to extend the time so limited."

Summary of this case from Landon v. Frank Improvement Co., Inc.

In Wulstein v. Wulstein (202 A.D. 849) a motion for a new trial was denied "on the ground that defendant's motion for a new trial was not made within the time limited to take an appeal * * * and that the court at Special Term was without power to extend the time so limited."

Summary of this case from Burns v. Hasbrouck
Case details for

Wulstein v. Wulstein

Case Details

Full title:BERTHA WULSTEIN, Appellant, v. HENRY WULSTEIN, Individually and as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 1, 1922

Citations

202 App. Div. 849 (N.Y. App. Div. 1922)

Citing Cases

Landon v. Frank Improvement Co., Inc.

That motion, however, so the opinion states, was made under section 549 of the Civil Practice Act which…

Burns v. Hasbrouck

Moreover, the mandatory requirement of section 552 on such an application that "notice therefor" must be…