From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wuest v. Catholic Healthcare West

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 20, 2011
Case No.: CV11-2550 CRB (N.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2011)

Opinion

Case No.: CV11-2550 CRB

10-20-2011

MICHELLE WUEST, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. CATHOLIC HEALTHCARE WEST, a California Corporation; ST. MARY'S REGIONAL HEALTH CENTER, an unknown Nevada entity; and Does 1-50, Inclusive, Defendants.

By: JASON J. KULLER, ESQ. (CAL#228157) THIERMAN LAW FIRM, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff MICHELLE WUEST By: DANIEL J. MCQUEEN, ESQ. (CAL#217498) SHEPPARD, MULLEN", RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP Attorney for Defendants CATHOLIC HEALTHCARE WEST and ST. MARY'S REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CENTER


Mark R. Ttnerman, NV#8285 CAL#72913

Jason Kuller, NV#12244 CAL#228157

Joshua Buck, NV#12187 CAL#258325

THIERMAN LAW FIRM, P.C.

Attorneys for Plaintiff MICHELLE WUEST

Richard J. Simmons, CAL#72666

Daniel J. McQueen, CAL# 217498

SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP

Attorneys for Defendants CATHOLIC HEALTHCARE WEST and ST. MARY'S

Assigned to Hon. Charles R. Breyer


JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE

DATE TO NOTIFY COURT OF POSSD3LE RESOLUTION

Pursuant to Local Rules 6-1(b) and 7-12, Plaintiff Michelle Wuest ("Plaintiff') and Defendants Catholic Healthcare West and St. Mary's Regional Health ("Defendants"), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and request as follows:

WHEREAS, on September 2,2011, the Court entered the following Order:

a. The parties are to proceed with informal discovery to allow resolution of the case;
b. Defendants' response to the amended complaint is continued; and
c. The parties are to inform the Court as to their position regarding resolution of the matter or the matter being transferred to Nevada by October 21, 2011.

WHEREAS, the parties have been diligently engaged in settlement negotiations in an attempt to inform the court as to their position by the October 21, 2011 deadline; however, the parties agree that they require additional time;

WHEREAS, the parties request an additional thirty (30) days to discuss resolution of the matter;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective counsel:

The deadline to inform the Court as to their position regarding resolution of the matter or the matter being transferred to Nevada is extended to November 21, 2011.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

By: JASON J. KULLER, ESQ. (CAL#228157)

THIERMAN LAW FIRM, P.C.

Attorneys for Plaintiff

MICHELLE WUEST

By: DANIEL J. MCQUEEN, ESQ. (CAL#217498)

SHEPPARD, MULLEN", RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP

Attorney for Defendants

CATHOLIC HEALTHCARE WEST and ST. MARY'S

REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CENTER

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED:

THE HON. CHARLES R. BREYER

UNITED STATED DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Wuest v. Catholic Healthcare West

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 20, 2011
Case No.: CV11-2550 CRB (N.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2011)
Case details for

Wuest v. Catholic Healthcare West

Case Details

Full title:MICHELLE WUEST, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 20, 2011

Citations

Case No.: CV11-2550 CRB (N.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2011)