Summary
granting the government's remand motion to the BIA for administrative closure
Summary of this case from Sarkar v. GarlandOpinion
No. 12-73458
11-25-2015
QIANCHANG WU, Petitioner, v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney, General Respondent.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION Agency No. A088-0288-898 ORDER On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted November 18, 2015 San Francisco, California Before: O'SCANNLAIN, FERNANDEZ, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). --------
Respondent's motion to remand this case to the Board of Immigration Appeals for administrative closure is GRANTED. As requested, the parties shall bear their own attorney's fees and costs on appeal.
This order served on the Board of Immigration Appeals shall constitute the mandate of this court.
REMANDED.