Opinion
3:21-cv-242-MMD-CLB
01-06-2022
W.T., a minor, by and through Guardians ad Litem and individuals, C.P and B.P., Plaintiffs, v. DOUGLAS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant.
Jean Murrell Adams, Esq. (State Bar No. 138458) Michelle Bumgarner, Esq Nevada Bar No. 10525 ADAMS ESQ, A Professional Corporation Michelle Bumgarner Attorneys for Plaintiff W.T. and Mr. and Mrs. Phillips Paul J. Anderson, Esq Attorneys for Defendant Douglas County School District
Jean Murrell Adams, Esq. (State Bar No. 138458)
Michelle Bumgarner, Esq Nevada Bar No. 10525
ADAMS ESQ, A Professional Corporation
Michelle Bumgarner Attorneys for Plaintiff W.T. and Mr. and Mrs. Phillips
Paul J. Anderson, Esq Attorneys for Defendant Douglas County School District
SUPPLEMENTAL JOINT STATUS MANAGEMENT REPORT
TO THE HONORABLE MIRANDA DU, UNITED STATES JUDGE
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) and Local Rule 26-1, Jean Murrell Adams, Esq., and Michelle Bumgarner, Esq., of the ADAMS ESQ law firm, counsel for Plaintiffs W.T., a minor, by and through his Guardian ad Litem, and individuals C.P. and B.P. ("Plaintiff or "Plaintiffs"); and Paul J. Anderson, Esq., of the law firm of Maupin, Cox & LeGoy, counsel for Defendant Douglas County School District ("DCSD" or "District"), met and conferred telephonically on January 5, 2022 and through subsequent e-mail exchanges to develop this Supplemental Joint Status Management Report which amends the Case Management Report as follows:.
1. CASE STATUS
The parties met and participated in a judicially mandated Settlement Conference on or about November 17, 2021. The parties were unable to reach a settlement, but did agree to limited discovery. Defendant timely responded to Plaintiffs' Request for Production of Documents on or about December 20, 2021. The parties participated in a "meet and confer" on January 5, 2022 to discuss documents Plaintiffs requested and believe to still be outstanding. Plaintiffs agreed to prepare a Supplemental Request for Production to which Defendant will respond. Accordingly, the parties request that the briefing schedule be extended by 60 days as provided below.
2. MOTIONS
There are no pending motions. The following is a list of anticipated motions:
Moving Party Subject Matter of the Motion
Plaintiffs and Defendant Motion for Summary Judgment
Plaintiffs and Defendant Motion to Supplement the Record
(if necessary)
The proposed hearing schedule for these motions is set forth below. Moving Party Subject Matter of the Motion with Dates Both Parties Motion to Supplement the Record - February 15, 2022
Plaintiffs/Defendant's Cross-Motion(s) for Summary Judgment - March 15, 2022 Defendants/Plaintiffs Opposition and Reply - April 15, 2022 Plaintiffs/Defendants Reply-April 29, 2022
All motion papers, oppositions and replies will be filed based on the periods above and in accordance with Local Rules.
3. CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
The Parties do not anticipate the need for a Case Management Conference at this time but will provide a revised Joint Case Management Report with scheduling changes in the event one is needed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.