Wsou Invs. v. Google LLC

2 Citing cases

  1. Resonant Sys. v. Apple, Inc.

    7:23-cv-00077-ADA (W.D. Tex. Aug. 23, 2024)

    Glob. Equity Mgmt. (SA) Pty. Ltd. v. Expedia, Inc., No. 216CV00095RWSRSP, 2016 WL 7416132, at *29 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 22, 2016); see also WSOU Invs. LLC v. Google LLC, No. 2022-1064, 2023 WL 6531525, at *4 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 6, 2023) (“There is no categorical rule that “processor” is or is not structural.”).

  2. Cleveland Med. Devices v. ResMed Inc.

    C. A. 22-794-GBW (D. Del. Oct. 30, 2023)

    Align Tech., Inc. v. 3Shape, C. A. No. 17-1648-LPS, 2021 WL 2320139, at *7 (D. Del. June 7, 2021); Techno View IP, Inc. v. Facebook Techs., LLC, C. A. No. 17-386-CFC-CJB, 2018 WL 6427874, at *7-8 (D. Del. Dec. 7,2018); see also Syncpoint Imaging, LLC v. Nintendo of Am. Inc., C. A. No. 15-00247-JRG-RSP, 2016 WL 55118, at *20-21 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 5, 2016). This is not a situation where the "claims do not describe how this processor interacts with the other claimed components in a way that might inform the structural character of the limitation." Cf. WSOU Invs. LLC v. Google LLC, No. 2022-1064, 2023 WL 6531525, at *4 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 6, 2023).