From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wrigley v. Nottingham

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Nov 9, 1965
145 S.E.2d 829 (Ga. Ct. App. 1965)

Opinion

40914.

DECIDED NOVEMBER 9, 1965.

Damages; breach of contract. Fulton Civil Court. Before Judge Williams.

Claude Hambrick, for plaintiffs in error.

Grant, Spears Duckworth, William H. Duckworth, Jr., contra.


The judgment of this court in Wrigley v. Nottingham, 111 Ga. App. 404 ( 141 S.E.2d 859), having been reversed by the Supreme Court of Georgia in Nottingham v. Wrigley, 221 Ga. 386 ( 144 S.E.2d 749), the judgment of this court is vacated. The judgment of this court must be conformed to that of the Supreme Court. Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is

Affirmed. Bell, P. J., Jordan and Eberhardt, JJ., concur.

DECIDED NOVEMBER 9, 1965.


Summaries of

Wrigley v. Nottingham

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Nov 9, 1965
145 S.E.2d 829 (Ga. Ct. App. 1965)
Case details for

Wrigley v. Nottingham

Case Details

Full title:WRIGLEY et al. v. NOTTINGHAM

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Nov 9, 1965

Citations

145 S.E.2d 829 (Ga. Ct. App. 1965)
112 Ga. App. 622

Citing Cases

Campbell v. Carroll

Many of the facets of the case at bar were also present in the case of Wrigley v. Nottingham, 111 Ga. App.…

Zagoria v. Dubose Enterprises

The law applicable to business corporations and professional corporations alike, then, is that shareholders…