From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wright v. Yates

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 30, 2008
No. CIV S-06-2798 LKK EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-2798 LKK EFB P.

January 30, 2008


ORDER


Petitioner is a state prisoner without counsel seeking a writ of habeas corpus. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He has requested that the court appoint counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). The court may appointment counsel at any stage of the proceedings "if the interests of justice so require." See 18 U.S.C. § 3006A; see also, Rule 8(c), Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. The court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at this stage of the proceedings.

Accordingly, it hereby is ORDERED that petitioner's December 4, 2007, motion for appointment of counsel is denied without prejudice.


Summaries of

Wright v. Yates

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 30, 2008
No. CIV S-06-2798 LKK EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2008)
Case details for

Wright v. Yates

Case Details

Full title:DONALD THOMAS WRIGHT, Petitioner, v. JAMES A. YATES, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 30, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-06-2798 LKK EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2008)