From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wright v. Waggoner

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Dec 14, 1920
193 P. 982 (Okla. 1920)

Opinion

No. 9687

Opinion Filed December 14, 1920.

(Syllabus by the Court.)

Appeal and Error — Failure to File Brief — Dismissal.

Where no briefs are filed, as required by rule 7 (47 Okla. vi; 165 Pac. vii) of the Supreme Court, the appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution.

Error from District Court, Major County; James B. Cullison, Judge.

Action between Grace Wright, individually and as administratrix of the estate of Jas. H. Slattery, deceased, and another and A.O. Waggoner, alias A.O. Wagner, and another. From the judgment, the parties first named bring error. Dismissed.

J.P. Evans, for plaintiffs in error.

Tom E. Willis and John V. Roberts, for defendants in error.


This cause was submitted April 20, 1920. In accordance with a stipulation duly filed plaintiffs in error were granted 30 days from that date within which to file their brief. On May 26, thereafter, plaintiffs in error were granted a further extension of 30 days. No briefs having been filed in the cause within the extensions of time granted and no further time having been requested (47 Okla. vi; 165 Pac. vii), the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Blanlot v. Carbon Coal Co., 76 Okla. 16, 183 P. 880; Cantwell v. Patterson, 71 Oklahoma, 174 P. 754; Balch v. Pickard, 72 Oklahoma, 179 P. 10.

RAINEY, C. J., and HARRISON, KANE. PITCHFORD, JOHNSON, McNEILL, BAILEY, and COLLIER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Wright v. Waggoner

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Dec 14, 1920
193 P. 982 (Okla. 1920)
Case details for

Wright v. Waggoner

Case Details

Full title:WRIGHT et al. v. WAGGONER et al

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Dec 14, 1920

Citations

193 P. 982 (Okla. 1920)
80 Okla. 56

Citing Cases

Gummere v. Coles

No brief having been filed, either as provided by the said rule, or within the 30 days allowed, and no…

City of Enid v. Davis

The cause was submitted in its regular order on February 14, 1922, and plaintiff in error was given 20 days…