From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wright v. Stubbs

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Feb 9, 2023
2:22-cv-01568-APG-BNW (D. Nev. Feb. 9, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-01568-APG-BNW

02-09-2023

FREDDIE JABARI WRIGHT, Plaintiff, v. LIEUTENANT STUBBS, Defendants.


ORDER

BRENDA WEKSLER UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff was in the custody of the Nevada Department of Corrections (“NDOC”) when he initiated this action by submitting a pro se civil-rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 together with an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) for an inmate. (ECF No. 1, 1-1). On September 30, 2022, the Court entered a screening order in which it allowed certain claims to proceed, deferred ruling on the IFP application, and imposed a 90-day stay for the parties to attempt to settle their differences. (ECF No. 3). The Court entered a subsequent order in which the parties were assigned to mediation by a court-appointed mediator. (ECF No. 6). The parties did not reach a settlement at the mediation conference. (See ECF No. 10).

The NDOC's Inmate Database reflects that Plaintiff has been released from custody. And Plaintiff appears to have updated his address with the Court accordingly. (ECF No. 9). So the Court now directs Plaintiff to file an application to proceed in forma pauperis for a non-inmate within 30 days from the date of this order or pay the full $402 filing fee. The Court will issue an order about service after the matter of payment of the filing fee has been resolved.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the application to proceed in forma pauperis for an inmate (ECF No. 1) is DENIED as moot.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to SEND Plaintiff the approved form application to proceed in forma pauperis for a non-inmate and the document entitled information and instructions for filing an in forma pauperis application.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that on or before March 9, 2023, Plaintiff shall either (1) file a fully complete application to proceed in forma pauperis for a non-inmate, or (2) pay the full $402 filing fee.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff fails to timely comply with this order, this action will be subject to dismissal without prejudice. A dismissal without prejudice allows Plaintiff to refile the case with the Court, under a new case number, when Plaintiff can file a complete application to proceed in forma pauperis for a non-inmate or pay the filing fee.


Summaries of

Wright v. Stubbs

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Feb 9, 2023
2:22-cv-01568-APG-BNW (D. Nev. Feb. 9, 2023)
Case details for

Wright v. Stubbs

Case Details

Full title:FREDDIE JABARI WRIGHT, Plaintiff, v. LIEUTENANT STUBBS, Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Feb 9, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-01568-APG-BNW (D. Nev. Feb. 9, 2023)