From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wright v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 29, 1991
579 So. 2d 418 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

No. 90-2124.

May 29, 1991.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Palm Beach County; Harold J. Cohen, Judge.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Paul E. Petillo, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Jacqueline Saltiel, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


We affirm. However, we have not considered the constitutional attack on Chapter 89-280, amending the Habitual Offender Statute, as appellant would have been habitualized under the pre-amended statute as well. See Henderson v. Antonacci, 62 So.2d 5 (Fla. 1952).

ANSTEAD, WARNER and FARMER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Wright v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 29, 1991
579 So. 2d 418 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

Wright v. State

Case Details

Full title:TOMMY WRIGHT, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: May 29, 1991

Citations

579 So. 2d 418 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Citing Cases

Wilson v. State

We need not reach appellant's point charging that section 775.084, Florida Statutes, as amended by Chapter…

Ward v. State

Appellant could have been sentenced as an habitual offender under section 775.084 as it read prior to the…