Opinion
No. 05-08-01186-CR
Opinion Filed July 28, 2009. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex. R. App. P. 47
On Appeal from the 204th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. F92-26775-SQ.
Before Justices MORRIS, RICHTER, and LANG-MIERS.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Eric Vincent Wright appeals the trial court's order denying his motion for post-conviction DNA testing. Appellant's attorney filed a brief in which she concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. Appellant filed a pro se response raising several issues. We have reviewed the record, counsel's brief, and appellant's pro se response. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824 (Tex.Crim.App. 2005). We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. We affirm the trial court's order denying appellant's request for post-conviction DNA testing.