From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wright v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 18, 1998
706 So. 2d 952 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

Case No. 97-751.

Opinion filed March 18, 1998.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Hugh A. Carithers, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender; Carl S. McGinnes, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General; Stephen R. White, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for appellee.


We find no merit in appellant's arguments challenging his conviction. Appellant's argument that the trial court erred in not conforming the written judgment of conviction and sentence to the oral pronouncement of sentence was not properly preserved for appeal. See Davis v. State, 23 Fla. L. Weekly D31 (Fla. 1st DCA Dec. 18, 1997). We, therefore, affirm.

We do not accept the state's concession as to this issue since the failure to preserve this issue for appeal appears clearly on the record.

BARFIELD, C.J., WOLF and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Wright v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 18, 1998
706 So. 2d 952 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)
Case details for

Wright v. State

Case Details

Full title:PORTER W. WRIGHT, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Mar 18, 1998

Citations

706 So. 2d 952 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Citing Cases

Durham v. State

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. Wright v. State, 706 So.2d 952, 953 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998) (citing Davis v. State, 704…