Wright v. State

Full title: RICKEY WRIGHT, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Mar 5, 1968

207 So. 2d 519 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968)

Opinion

No. 67-235.

March 5, 1968.

Appeal from the Criminal Court of Record, Dade County, Carling Stedman, J.

Robert L. Koeppel, Public Defender and Edward J. Winter, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen. and Jesse J. McCrary, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, C.J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was convicted after a nonjury trial of robbery and sentenced to ten years in the State prison. On this appeal the point presented urges that the appellant was denied a fair trial because he was entitled to inspection at trial of a prosecution witness' statement for the purpose of cross examination. The statement was not introduced into evidence or used by the witness in testifying. This point has been decided adversely to the appellant. See McAden v. State, 155 Fla. 523, 21 So.2d 33 (1945); Jackman v. State, Fla.App. 1962, 140 So.2d 627; State v. McCall, Fla.App. 1966, 186 So.2d 324.

Affirmed.