From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wright v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Apr 11, 2006
925 So. 2d 451 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Opinion

No. 1D04-3592.

April 11, 2006.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Washington County. Glenn L. Hess, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender; Phil Patterson, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Charlie Crist, Attorney General; Alan R. Dakan, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for appellee.


Appellant asserts that the trial court reversibly erred by imposing consecutive habitual violent felony offender sentences, each with a minimum mandatory term of imprisonment, for offenses that arose from a single criminal episode. We agree as to counts III and IV. We, therefore, reverse the sentences as to those counts and remand for imposition of concurrent sentences as to counts III and IV. However, we conclude that the other offenses occurred during separate criminal episodes and uphold the consecutive sentences imposed as to those offenses. Because the criminal episode giving rise to the offenses charged in counts III and IV was separate from the criminal episodes giving rise to the remaining counts, the trial court is directed on remand to run the concurrent terms for counts III and IV consecutive to the sentences originally imposed on the remaining counts. Appellant need not be present for the ministerial act of correcting his sentences. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

KAHN, C.J., WOLF, and PADOVANO, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Wright v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Apr 11, 2006
925 So. 2d 451 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
Case details for

Wright v. State

Case Details

Full title:Tracy B. WRIGHT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Apr 11, 2006

Citations

925 So. 2d 451 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)