From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wright v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware
Feb 6, 2009
966 A.2d 349 (Del. 2009)

Opinion

No. 496, 2008.

February 6, 2009.

Court Below — Superior Court of the State of Delaware, in and for New Castle County, Cr. ID 0007020610.

Before HOLLAND, BERGER, and JACOBS, Justices.


ORDER


This 6th day of February 2009, it appears to the Court that:

(1) The appellant, Bruce Wright, filed this appeal from a decision of the Superior Court, dated August 27, 2008, which denied Wright's request for transcripts of the grand jury proceedings that ultimately led to his 2002 criminal conviction on charges of second degree murder and weapon offenses. The State filed a motion to dismiss Wright's appeal as interlocutory and, alternatively, filed a motion to affirm the judgment below on the ground that it is manifest on the face of Wright's opening brief that his appeal is without merit.

See Wright v. State, 818 A.2d 950 (Del. 2003).

(2) Under the Delaware Constitution, this Court may only review a final judgment in a criminal case. The Superior Court's denial of Wright's request for transcripts of the grand jury proceedings, which he sought presumably to pursue a postconviction remedy, is clearly an unappealable interlocutory ruling. As a result, this Court does not have jurisdiction to review this appeal.

Del. Const. art. IV , § 11(1)(b).

See Robinson v. State, 704 A.2d 269, 271 (Del. 1998); Browne v. State, 1992 WL 21146 (Del. Jan. 21, 1992).

See Gottlieb v. State, 697 A.2d 400 (Del. 1997).

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. The motion to affirm is moot.


Summaries of

Wright v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware
Feb 6, 2009
966 A.2d 349 (Del. 2009)
Case details for

Wright v. State

Case Details

Full title:Wright v. State

Court:Supreme Court of Delaware

Date published: Feb 6, 2009

Citations

966 A.2d 349 (Del. 2009)