From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wright v. State

Florida Court of Appeals, Third District
Aug 28, 2024
No. 3D24-1210 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Aug. 28, 2024)

Opinion

3D24-1210

08-28-2024

Reginald Wright, Petitioner, v. The State of Florida, Respondent.

Reginald Wright, in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Christina L. Dominguez, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.


Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. Lower Tribunal No. F82-26408A

A Case of Original Jurisdiction - Habeas Corpus.

Reginald Wright, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Christina L. Dominguez, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Before LOGUE, C.J., and LINDSEY and BOKOR, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Denied. See Frances v. State, 143 So.3d 340, 357 (Fla. 2014) (explaining that "the failure of appellate counsel to raise [a] meritless issue will not render appellate counsel's performance ineffective" (citing Rutherford v. Moore, 774 So.2d 637, 643 (Fla. 2000))).


Summaries of

Wright v. State

Florida Court of Appeals, Third District
Aug 28, 2024
No. 3D24-1210 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Aug. 28, 2024)
Case details for

Wright v. State

Case Details

Full title:Reginald Wright, Petitioner, v. The State of Florida, Respondent.

Court:Florida Court of Appeals, Third District

Date published: Aug 28, 2024

Citations

No. 3D24-1210 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Aug. 28, 2024)