From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wright v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Jul 11, 2023
671 S.W.3d 427 (Mo. Ct. App. 2023)

Opinion

WD 85595

07-11-2023

Destynie WRIGHT, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nancy A. McKerrow, Special Public Defender, Columbia, MO, Attorney for Appellant. Andrew Bailey, Attorney General, and Shaun J Mackelprang, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, Attorneys for Respondent.


Nancy A. McKerrow, Special Public Defender, Columbia, MO, Attorney for Appellant.

Andrew Bailey, Attorney General, and Shaun J Mackelprang, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, Attorneys for Respondent.

Before Division One: Mark D. Pfeiffer, Presiding Judge, and Cynthia L. Martin and W. Douglas Thomson, Judges

Order

Per Curiam:

Ms. Destynie Wright appeals from the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri, denying, after an evidentiary hearing, her Rule 29.15 amended motion for post-conviction relief. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision because a published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Wright v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Jul 11, 2023
671 S.W.3d 427 (Mo. Ct. App. 2023)
Case details for

Wright v. State

Case Details

Full title:Destynie WRIGHT, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Jul 11, 2023

Citations

671 S.W.3d 427 (Mo. Ct. App. 2023)