From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wright v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Oct 16, 2013
No. 62861 (Nev. Oct. 16, 2013)

Opinion

No. 62861

2013-10-16

ROBERT EARL WRIGHT, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.


An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

This is a proper person appeal from an order of the district court denying a motion to correct an illegal sentence. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Douglas W. Herndon, Judge.

This appeal has been submitted for decision without oral argument, NRAP 34(f)(3), and we conclude that the record is sufficient for our review and briefing is unwarranted. See Luckett v. Warden, 91 Nev. 681, 682, 541 P.2d 910, 911 (1975).

In his motion filed on February 4, 2013, appellant challenged his habitual criminal adjudication. Appellant failed to demonstrate that his sentence was facially illegal or that the district court lacked jurisdiction. See Edwards v. State, 112 Nev. 704, 708, 918 P.2d 321, 324 (1996). We therefore conclude that the district court did not err in denying appellant's motion. Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

______________________, J.

Hardesty
______________________, J.
Parraguirre
______________________, J.
Cherry
cc: Hon. Douglas W. Herndon, District Judge

Robert Earl Wright

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Wright v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Oct 16, 2013
No. 62861 (Nev. Oct. 16, 2013)
Case details for

Wright v. State

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT EARL WRIGHT, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Oct 16, 2013

Citations

No. 62861 (Nev. Oct. 16, 2013)