From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wright v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Jun 10, 1959
324 S.W.2d 883 (Tex. Crim. App. 1959)

Opinion

No. 30809.

June 10, 1959.

Appeal from the County Court at Law, Lubbock County, Pat S. Moore, J.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.


The conviction is under Art. 567b, Vernon's Ann.P.C., for the giving of a worthless check in the amount of $15, with punishment assessed at 30 days in jail and a fine of $25.

The complaint upon which the information is based fails to allege that the check was given with intent to defraud. The intent to defraud is an essential element of the offense. Art. 567b, Sec. 1, supra; Kuykendall v. State, 143 Tex.Crim. R., 160 S.W.2d 525. Being an essential element of the offense, such intent should have been alleged in the complaint. Browder v. State, 163 Tex.Crim. R., 292 S.W.2d 342, and McCormick v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 323 S.W.2d 462.

A valid complaint is a prerequisite to a valid information. Addison v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 283 S.W.2d 55.

The judgment is reversed and the prosecution is ordered dismissed.

Opinion approved by the Court.


Summaries of

Wright v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Jun 10, 1959
324 S.W.2d 883 (Tex. Crim. App. 1959)
Case details for

Wright v. State

Case Details

Full title:Mrs. G. R. WRIGHT, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Jun 10, 1959

Citations

324 S.W.2d 883 (Tex. Crim. App. 1959)
324 S.W.2d 883

Citing Cases

Richardson v. State

A conviction would not have been sustained had the indictment contained the required allegation.         To…

Parsons v. State

The intent to defraud is an essential element of the offense. Art. 567b, Sec. 1, supra, Wright v. State, 168…