From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wright v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Jul 3, 1951
233 P.2d 322 (Okla. Crim. App. 1951)

Opinion

No. A-11358.

July 3, 1951.

(Syllabus.)

Appeal and Error — Sufficiency of Evidence to Sustain Judgment.

Appeal from County Court, Kiowa County; Clarence W. Hunter, Judge.

Willis Carl Wright was convicted of driving an automobile on the public highway while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, and he appeals. Affirmed.

Hughes Hughes, Hobart, for plaintiff in error.

Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., for defendant in error.


The defendant, Willis Carl Wright, was convicted in the county court of Kiowa county of the offense of driving an automobile on the public highway while under the influence of intoxicating liquor and pursuant to the verdict of the jury was sentenced to pay a fine of $10; and has appealed.

No brief has been filed on behalf of the defendant.

We have examined the record and while the testimony conflicted in some particulars, the evidence of the state was fairly conclusive of the defendant's guilt. No fundamental error appearing, the judgment is affirmed.

BRETT, P.J., and POWELL, J., concur.


Summaries of

Wright v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Jul 3, 1951
233 P.2d 322 (Okla. Crim. App. 1951)
Case details for

Wright v. State

Case Details

Full title:WRIGHT v. STATE

Court:Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma

Date published: Jul 3, 1951

Citations

233 P.2d 322 (Okla. Crim. App. 1951)
233 P.2d 322