From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wright v. Shoe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION
May 24, 2012
Civil Action No. 7:11-CV-74 (HL) (M.D. Ga. May. 24, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 7:11-CV-74 (HL)

05-24-2012

LARRY D. WRIGHT JR., Plaintiff, v. LESA SHOE and EUGENE CREWS, M.D., Defendants.


ORDER

This case is before the Court on a Recommendation from United States Magistrate Judge Thomas Q. Langstaff (Doc. 48), entered on May 1, 2012. Judge Langstaff recommends that the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants Shoe and Crews (Doc. 28) be granted. Plaintiff has not filed an objection to the Recommendation. The Court has reviewed the Recommendation for clear error, and finds no error. The Recommendation is accepted and adopted. The Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 28) is granted. Plaintiff's Motion for More Definite Statement (Doc. 50) and Motion to Appoint Counsel (Doc. 51) are denied.

Hugh Lawson

HUGH LAWSON, SENIOR JUDGE
mbh


Summaries of

Wright v. Shoe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION
May 24, 2012
Civil Action No. 7:11-CV-74 (HL) (M.D. Ga. May. 24, 2012)
Case details for

Wright v. Shoe

Case Details

Full title:LARRY D. WRIGHT JR., Plaintiff, v. LESA SHOE and EUGENE CREWS, M.D.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION

Date published: May 24, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 7:11-CV-74 (HL) (M.D. Ga. May. 24, 2012)