From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wright v. Scoma

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 17, 2022
2:22-cv-01282-APG-NJK (D. Nev. Oct. 17, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-01282-APG-NJK

10-17-2022

TYLER WRIGHT, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL B. SCOMA, et al, Defendants.


ORDER [DOCKET NO. 9]

Nancy J. Koppe United States Magistrate Judge.

Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs proposed discovery plan. Docket No. 9. Proposed discovery plans must be submitted as a stipulation. Local Rule 26-1(a). Written stipulations must be signed by all parties or their attorneys. Local Rule 7-l(a). Plaintiffs proposed discovery plan has not been signed by Defendants or Defendants' counsel, Docket No. 9 at 3, and is therefore not a properly formatted stipulation.

Accordingly, Plaintiffs proposed discovery plan is DENIED without prejudice. A properly formatted joint proposed discovery plan must be submitted no later than October 24, 2022.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Wright v. Scoma

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 17, 2022
2:22-cv-01282-APG-NJK (D. Nev. Oct. 17, 2022)
Case details for

Wright v. Scoma

Case Details

Full title:TYLER WRIGHT, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL B. SCOMA, et al, Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Oct 17, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-01282-APG-NJK (D. Nev. Oct. 17, 2022)