From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wright v. Runnels

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 12, 2009
No. CIV S-02-1656 LKK EFB P (E.D. Cal. May. 12, 2009)

Opinion

No. CIV S-02-1656 LKK EFB P.

May 12, 2009


ORDER


Petitioner is a prisoner without counsel who sought habeas corpus relief in this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a). On November 30, 2005, the assigned magistrate judge found there was no basis for granting relief and recommended that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be denied. On January 30, 2006, the assigned district judge adopted that recommendation and denied the petition. Judgment was entered accordingly. Notwithstanding that judgment, on May 4, 2009, petitioner filed a motion for appointment of counsel. Good cause has not been shown for submitting a motion for appointment of counsel after judgement has been entered.

Accordingly, the May 4, 2009, motion for appointment of counsel is denied.

The court notes that it will issue no response to future filings by petitioner in this action not authorized by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

So ordered.


Summaries of

Wright v. Runnels

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 12, 2009
No. CIV S-02-1656 LKK EFB P (E.D. Cal. May. 12, 2009)
Case details for

Wright v. Runnels

Case Details

Full title:DOMINIC WRIGHT, Petitioner, v. D.L. RUNNELS, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 12, 2009

Citations

No. CIV S-02-1656 LKK EFB P (E.D. Cal. May. 12, 2009)