From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wright v. Rumbles

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 2, 2011
CASE NO. 1:05-cv-01485-SKO PC (E.D. Cal. Sep. 2, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:05-cv-01485-SKO PC ECF No. 78 ECF No. 80

09-02-2011

RAYMOND WRIGHT, Plaintiff, v. RUMBLES, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION

TO COMPEL AS UNTIMELY

Plaintiff Raymond Wright ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding on the second amended complaint, filed October 21, 2006, against Defendants Rumbles and Doe for excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment. On September 14, 2010, the discovery and scheduling order issued in this action setting the discovery cut-off date as May 14, 2011. (ECF No. 63.) The discovery and scheduling order informed the parties that "the completion of all discovery, including filing motions to compel, shall be 05/14/2011." (Id. at 2:15-16.) Plaintiff filed a motion to compel on June 3, 2011. (ECF No. 78.) The proof of service attached to Plaintiff's motion to compel is dated May 27, 2011. Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion to compel is untimely and is

HEREBY DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Sandra M. Snyder

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Wright v. Rumbles

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 2, 2011
CASE NO. 1:05-cv-01485-SKO PC (E.D. Cal. Sep. 2, 2011)
Case details for

Wright v. Rumbles

Case Details

Full title:RAYMOND WRIGHT, Plaintiff, v. RUMBLES, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 2, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. 1:05-cv-01485-SKO PC (E.D. Cal. Sep. 2, 2011)