From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wright v. Reynolds

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Feb 3, 1949
172 F.2d 762 (D.C. Cir. 1949)

Opinion

No. 9791.

Argued January 25, 1949.

Decided February 3, 1949.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia (now the United States District Court for the District of Columbia).

Mr. Maurice A. Guervitz, of Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Louis Ginberg, of Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellant. Mr. Stanley H. Kamerow, of Washington, D.C., also entered an appearance for appellant.

Mr. John D. Lane, Assistant United States Attorney, of Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. George Morris Fay, United States Attorney, of Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellees. Mr. Sidney S. Sachs, of Washington, D.C., also entered an appearance for appellees.

Before EDGERTON and WILBUR K. MILLER, Circuit Judges, and HOLTZOFF, District Judge, sitting by designation.


We find no prejudicial error in the record. The judgment of the District Court is therefore affirmed.


Summaries of

Wright v. Reynolds

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Feb 3, 1949
172 F.2d 762 (D.C. Cir. 1949)
Case details for

Wright v. Reynolds

Case Details

Full title:Eola M. WRIGHT, Appellant, v. W.E. REYNOLDS, Commissioner, Public…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit

Date published: Feb 3, 1949

Citations

172 F.2d 762 (D.C. Cir. 1949)