From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wright v. Miles

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Sep 12, 2024
4:24-cv-00575-BRW (E.D. Ark. Sep. 12, 2024)

Opinion

4:24-cv-00575-BRW

09-12-2024

JAMES WRIGHT ADC #142769 PLAINTIFF v. MILES, et al. DEFENDANTS


ORDER

BILLY ROY WILSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

I have reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommendation submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris and Plaintiff's objections. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record in this case, I approve and adopt the Proposed Findings and Recommendation in all respects. Accordingly, the claims are dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.

Accordingly, Wright's complaint is dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.

I recommend for future jurists that dismissal of this action count as a “strike” within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), an in forma pauperis appeal from the order adopting this recommendation would not be taken in good faith.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Wright v. Miles

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Sep 12, 2024
4:24-cv-00575-BRW (E.D. Ark. Sep. 12, 2024)
Case details for

Wright v. Miles

Case Details

Full title:JAMES WRIGHT ADC #142769 PLAINTIFF v. MILES, et al. DEFENDANTS

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Sep 12, 2024

Citations

4:24-cv-00575-BRW (E.D. Ark. Sep. 12, 2024)

Citing Cases

Wright v. Litzsey

Before initiating this § 1983 action on December 2, 2024, Wright had at least three cases dismissed for one…