Summary
overturning a false light invasion of privacy judgment because the plaintiff admitted that the offending material "was intended and taken as a ‘joke’ perpetrated by a coworker"
Summary of this case from Davenport v. Edward D. Jones & Co.Opinion
No. 136324.
July 23, 2008.
Court of Appeals No. 274668.
Summary Disposition July 23, 2008.
Pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we reverse in part the judgment of the Court of Appeals and we remand this case to the Oakland Circuit Court for reinstatement of the circuit court's summary disposition order. The Court of Appeals erred by reinstating the plaintiffs defamation and false light invasion of privacy claims where the plaintiff consented to the ongoing posting of the allegedly offending material, Smith v Calvary Christian Church, 462 Mich 679 (2000), and where the plaintiff admitted that the material was intended and taken as a "joke" perpetrated by a coworker. The Court of Appeals erred by reinstating the plaintiffs negligence and intentional infliction of emotional distress claims, where these are personal injury claims barred by the exclusive remedy provision of the Worker's Disability Compensation Act, MCL 418.131(1), and the plaintiff has presented no evidence that the defendant employer intended to injure the plaintiff or had actual knowledge that an injury was certain to occur and willfully disregarded that knowledge. Travis v Dreis Krump Mfg Co, 453 Mich 149 (1996).