From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wright v. Joplin

United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Fort Smith Division
Oct 25, 2010
Case No. 10-2122 (W.D. Ark. Oct. 25, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 10-2122.

October 25, 2010


ORDER


Now on this 25th day of October 2010, there comes on for consideration the report and recommendation filed herein on October 5, 2010, by the Honorable Erin L. Setser, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. (Doc. 6). No objections were filed.

The court has reviewed this case and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds as follows: The report and recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED on the grounds that the claims are frivolous, asserted against individuals who are immune from suit, or fail to state claims on which relief can be granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)-(iii) (IFP action may be dismissed on such grounds at any time). The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over any state law claims. 28 U.S.C. § 1367.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Wright v. Joplin

United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Fort Smith Division
Oct 25, 2010
Case No. 10-2122 (W.D. Ark. Oct. 25, 2010)
Case details for

Wright v. Joplin

Case Details

Full title:JAMES BRIAN WRIGHT PLAINTIFF v. JOHN JOPLIN, Sebastian County Public…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Fort Smith Division

Date published: Oct 25, 2010

Citations

Case No. 10-2122 (W.D. Ark. Oct. 25, 2010)

Citing Cases

Gatson v. Fire Brick Co.

(1) Where a case is improperly sent on appeal to the Court of Appeals, when the same should have been sent to…