From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wright v. Jeaffreson

United States District Court, Northern District of Florida
Jun 26, 2024
4:24cv235-MW/MAF (N.D. Fla. Jun. 26, 2024)

Opinion

4:24cv235-MW/MAF

06-26-2024

ROBERT LEE WRIGHT, III, Plaintiff, v. JOHN CORDY JEAFFRESON, Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Mark E. Walker, Chief United States District Judge

This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 4, and has also reviewed de novo Plaintiff's objections, ECF No. 5.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation, ECF No. 4, is accepted and adopted, over the Plaintiff's objections, as this Court's opinion. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, “Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice under the three-strikes provision of 28 U.S.C.§ 1915(g), because Plaintiff did not pay the filing fee and fails to meet the imminent danger exception.”

Defendant's motion for relief from the obligation to prepay the filing fee, ECF No. 6, and Defendant's motion for application to proceed in forma pauperis are DENIED. The Clerk shall close the file.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Wright v. Jeaffreson

United States District Court, Northern District of Florida
Jun 26, 2024
4:24cv235-MW/MAF (N.D. Fla. Jun. 26, 2024)
Case details for

Wright v. Jeaffreson

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT LEE WRIGHT, III, Plaintiff, v. JOHN CORDY JEAFFRESON, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of Florida

Date published: Jun 26, 2024

Citations

4:24cv235-MW/MAF (N.D. Fla. Jun. 26, 2024)

Citing Cases

Wright v. Lyublanovits

Id. His complaint takes issue with a judgment in a separate case dismissed under § 1915(g), Wright v. …