From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wright v. Horel

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 28, 2008
1:06-cv-00925 TAG (HC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 28, 2008)

Opinion

1:06-cv-00925 TAG (HC).

February 28, 2008


ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION (Doc. 13)


On February 27, 2008, Petitioner filed a motion for an extension of time to file an opposition to Respondent's motion to dismiss the instant petition for writ of habeas corpus. (Doc. 13). The Court has considered Petitioner's motion, finds that good cause exists to grant it in part, and makes the following order:

1. Petitioner's motion for an extension of time to file an opposition to Respondent's motion to dismiss is GRANTED, but only for thirty (30) days;

2. Petitioner shall have to and including March 31, 2008 to file an opposition; and

3. No further extensions of time will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances.

Petitioner is advised that failure to comply with this order may result in an order dismissing the petition for writ of habeas corpus.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Wright v. Horel

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 28, 2008
1:06-cv-00925 TAG (HC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 28, 2008)
Case details for

Wright v. Horel

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT CONNER WRIGHT, Petitioner, v. ROBERT A. HOREL, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 28, 2008

Citations

1:06-cv-00925 TAG (HC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 28, 2008)