From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wright v. Harrison

United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Macon Division
Oct 5, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:10-CV-184(MTT) (M.D. Ga. Oct. 5, 2011)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:10-CV-184 (MTT).

October 5, 2011


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Charles H. Weigle. (Doc. 28). The Magistrate Judge recommends granting the Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment (Docs. 20 and 22) because the Plaintiff's allegations do not contain sufficient factual matter to establish a plausible claim under the Eighth or Fourteenth Amendment. The Plaintiff did not file an objection to the Recommendation. The Court has reviewed the Recommendation, and the Recommendation is adopted and made the order of this Court. The Motions are granted, and the Plaintiff's claims are dismissed with prejudice.

The Magistrate Judge construed both Motions for Summary Judgment as Motions to Dismiss, in part, because the Defendants argue that the claims against them should be dismissed on account of the Plaintiff's failure to adequately state a claim upon which relief may be granted.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Wright v. Harrison

United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Macon Division
Oct 5, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:10-CV-184(MTT) (M.D. Ga. Oct. 5, 2011)
Case details for

Wright v. Harrison

Case Details

Full title:WILLIE FRANK WRIGHT, JR., Plaintiff, v. THERON HARRISON, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Macon Division

Date published: Oct 5, 2011

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:10-CV-184(MTT) (M.D. Ga. Oct. 5, 2011)