From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wright v. Goodrich

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Apr 12, 2017
No. 16-16281 (11th Cir. Apr. 12, 2017)

Opinion

No. 16-16281

04-12-2017

ROBERT H. WRIGHT, JR., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JOHN GOODRICH, Deputy, JERALD WATSON, Defendant-Appellants.


[DO NOT PUBLISH] D.C. Docket No. 4:15-cv-00034-CDL Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia Before WILSON and BLACK Circuit Judges, and RESTANI, Judge. PER CURIAM:

Honorable Jane A. Restani, Judge for the United States Court of International Trade, sitting by designation. --------

After careful review of the briefs and the record, and having the benefit of oral argument, we find no reversible error. We have considered all of John Goodrich and Jerald Watson's specifications of error, reviewing de novo the following:

1. Whether the district court erred in denying Watson and Goodrich qualified immunity on Robert Wright's Fourth Amendment claim?

2. Whether the district court erred in in denying Watson and Goodrich official immunity on Robert Wright's parallel state law claim?
The decision of the district court is

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Wright v. Goodrich

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Apr 12, 2017
No. 16-16281 (11th Cir. Apr. 12, 2017)
Case details for

Wright v. Goodrich

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT H. WRIGHT, JR., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JOHN GOODRICH, Deputy…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 12, 2017

Citations

No. 16-16281 (11th Cir. Apr. 12, 2017)

Citing Cases

Wright v. Watson

The events of the search and Mr. Wright's prosecution are well documented by the district court. See Wright…

Wright v. Watson

Defendants were part of a law enforcement team that "hovered over [Plaintiff's] rural home in a helicopter,…