From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wright v. General Motors Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 5, 1983
96 A.D.2d 510 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Opinion

July 5, 1983


In a personal injury action, plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roncallo, J.), entered July 13, 1983, which denied their motion to reargue. Appeal dismissed, without costs or disbursements. Plaintiffs claim that their motion was in fact a motion to renew. However, they concede that there were no new or additional facts presented in their moving papers since the record before Special Term on the prior motion contained their "additional facts". Therefore, the motion was in fact a motion to reargue and no appeal lies from the denial of such a motion (see Klatz v Armor Elevator Co., 93 A.D.2d 633). Damiani, J.P., Mangano, O'Connor and Niehoff, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Wright v. General Motors Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 5, 1983
96 A.D.2d 510 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)
Case details for

Wright v. General Motors Corporation

Case Details

Full title:GERALD G. WRIGHT et al., Appellants, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 5, 1983

Citations

96 A.D.2d 510 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Citing Cases

Zebrowski v. Trustees of Town of Brookhaven

Although the plaintiffs designated their motion as one for "renewal and reargument", the motion alleged no…

Magliano v. Merckling

February 27, 1984 In an action to recover damages for personal injuries and injury to property, defendant…