From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wright v. Eastman Kodak Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 11, 2004
4 A.D.3d 882 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

CA 03-01791.

February 11, 2004.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Harold L. Galloway, J.), entered April 1, 2003. The order granted plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment on the Labor Law § 240(1) claim.

FELDMAN, KIEFFER HERMAN, LLP, BUFFALO (STEPHEN A. MANUELE OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

MORAN KUFTA, P.C., ROCHESTER (PAUL A. MARASCO OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS.

Before: PRESENT: HURLBUTT, J.P., SCUDDER, KEHOE, GORSKI, AND HAYES, JJ.


ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed with costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court.


Summaries of

Wright v. Eastman Kodak Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 11, 2004
4 A.D.3d 882 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

Wright v. Eastman Kodak Company

Case Details

Full title:RONALD L. WRIGHT AND GAIL M. WRIGHT, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. EASTMAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 11, 2004

Citations

4 A.D.3d 882 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
771 N.Y.S.2d 469