From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wright v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Sep 8, 2014
Case No. 13-13191 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 8, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. 13-13191

09-08-2014

KIMBERLY WRIGHT, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.


Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majzoub OPINION AND ORDER

On July 25, 2013, Plaintiff Kimberly Wright, who is proceeding pro se, filed this lawsuit challenging a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying Plaintiff's application for supplemental security income under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. The same day, the lawsuit was referred to Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majzoub for all pretrial matters proceedings, including a hearing and determination of all non-dispositive matters pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and/or a report and recommendation ("R&R") on all dispositive matters pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). On December 18, 2013, the Court received two letters from Plaintiff: one written by Plaintiff and the other by Plaintiff's sister. The letters do not challenge any specific findings of the Administrative Law Judge's ("ALJ") adverse determination. After a series of extensions, Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 on May 19, 2014. On June 30, 2014, Magistrate Judge Majzoub issued an R&R recommending that this Court grant Defendant's motion.

In her R&R, Magistrate Judge Majzoub reviews the ALJ's determination and considers the content of the letters submitted by Plaintiff before concluding that there was substantial evidence in the record to support the ALJ's determination that Plaintiff was not under a disability as that term is used in the Social Security Act. At the conclusion of the R&R, Magistrate Judge Majzoub advises the parties that they may object to and seek review of the R&R within fourteen days of service upon them. She further specifically advises the parties that the "[f]ailure to file specific objections constitutes a waiver of any further right to appeal." Neither party filed objections to the R&R.

The Court has carefully reviewed the R&R and concurs with the conclusions reached by Magistrate Judge Majzoub. The Court therefore adopts Magistrate Judge Majzoub's June 30, 2014 Report and Recommendation. On a final note, the Court realizes that Plaintiff elected to represent herself throughout the course of her social security proceedings and points out that this may have impacted the strength of Plaintiff's case. Plaintiff should note that she is not precluded from reapplying for social security benefits.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Defendant's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. Dated: September 8, 2014

s/Patrick J. Duggan

PATRICK J. DUGGAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies to: Kimberly Wright
32149 Beverly Road
Romulus, MI 48171
Meghan O'Callaghan, Esq.
Vanessa Miree Mays, AUSA
Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majzoub


Summaries of

Wright v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Sep 8, 2014
Case No. 13-13191 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 8, 2014)
Case details for

Wright v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Case Details

Full title:KIMBERLY WRIGHT, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 8, 2014

Citations

Case No. 13-13191 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 8, 2014)