From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wright v. Commonwealth Primary Care

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Sep 6, 2011
445 F. App'x 632 (4th Cir. 2011)

Opinion

No. 11-1028

09-06-2011

DEBBIE WRIGHT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH PRIMARY CARE, INCORPORATED, d/b/a Wyndham Family Practice; MELANIE P. BOGGS, M.D., Defendants - Appellees.

William G. Shields, THE SHIELDS LAW FIRM, PLLC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Paul T. Walkinshaw, Garland B. Nagy, HANCOCK, DANIEL, JOHNSON & NAGLE, P.C., Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:10-cv-00034-JRS)

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William G. Shields, THE SHIELDS LAW FIRM, PLLC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Paul T. Walkinshaw, Garland B. Nagy, HANCOCK, DANIEL, JOHNSON & NAGLE, P.C., Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Debbie Wright appeals the district court's orders striking Wright's expert designation and dismissing her complaint and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wright v. Commonwealth Primary Care, No. 3:10-cv-00034-JRS (E.D. Va. Nov. 2 & Dec. 9, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Wright v. Commonwealth Primary Care

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Sep 6, 2011
445 F. App'x 632 (4th Cir. 2011)
Case details for

Wright v. Commonwealth Primary Care

Case Details

Full title:DEBBIE WRIGHT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH PRIMARY CARE…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Sep 6, 2011

Citations

445 F. App'x 632 (4th Cir. 2011)