From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wright v. Clark

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 10, 2010
1:07 CV 00462 AWI YNP SMS (PC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 10, 2010)

Opinion

1:07 CV 00462 AWI YNP SMS (PC).

February 10, 2010


ORDER


On February 9, 2010, an order was entered by the District Court, adopting the October 29, 2009, findings and recommendations that the motion to dismiss by Defendants Baires, Figueroa, Gonzalez, Grannis, Hernandez, Kernan, Lefler, Lima, Miller, Nesmith, Orozco, Pearce, Peterson and Rivera be denied. The matter was referred to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Baires, Figueroa, Gonzalez, Grannis, Hernandez, Kernan, Lefler, Lima, Miller, Nesmith, Orozco, Pearce, Peterson and Rivera shall, within thirty days of the date of service of this order, file a further response to the March 27, 2008, first amended complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Wright v. Clark

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 10, 2010
1:07 CV 00462 AWI YNP SMS (PC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 10, 2010)
Case details for

Wright v. Clark

Case Details

Full title:RAYMOND WRIGHT, Plaintiff, v. KEN CLARK, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 10, 2010

Citations

1:07 CV 00462 AWI YNP SMS (PC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 10, 2010)