Opinion
May, 1924.
Award reversed and claim dismissed, with costs against the State Industrial Board, on the ground that the award rests on the uncorroborated hearsay statements of the deceased. All concur, except Hinman, J., not voting.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Wright v. Brooklyn Union Gas Company
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 1, 1924
209 App. Div. 844 (N.Y. App. Div. 1924)
Summaries of
Wright v. Brooklyn Union Gas Company
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 1, 1924
209 App. Div. 844 (N.Y. App. Div. 1924)
Case details for
Wright v. Brooklyn Union Gas Company
Case Details
Full title:Before STATE INDUSTRIAL BOARD, Respondent. MARY E. WRIGHT, Respondent, v…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Date published: May 1, 1924
Citations
209 App. Div. 844 (N.Y. App. Div. 1924)