From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wright v. Bloom

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 10, 2013
No. C 12-00746 WHA (N.D. Cal. May. 10, 2013)

Opinion

No. C 12-00746 WHA

05-10-2013

VERN WRIGHT, JUNE WRIGHT, and SUPERANTENNA CORPORATION, Plaintiffs, v. MICHAEL BLOOM, JAIMEE BLOOM, KINGSBRIDGE CORPORATION, OFFSHORE SOLUTIONS, INC., SINOTECH CORPORATION, DIFONA COMMUNICATION GMBH, BULLIVANT HOUSER BAILEY PC, and DOES 1-10, Defendants.


SECOND ORDER RE

MOTION TO WITHDRAW

Counsel for Difona Communication GMBH's motion to withdraw as counsel is currently pending and is set for hearing on May 23 (Dkt. No. 109). The hearing on the motion will go forward as scheduled. Counsel for Difona must make sure that Difona itself is aware of the pending motion and is further aware that it has the right to appear and to be heard at the hearing. Difona has appeared in this action via the filing of its answer. If Difona's current counsel were allowed to withdraw following the hearing (not a foregone conclusion), Difona's continued litigation in this action could only proceed through substituted counsel.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

________________________

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Wright v. Bloom

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 10, 2013
No. C 12-00746 WHA (N.D. Cal. May. 10, 2013)
Case details for

Wright v. Bloom

Case Details

Full title:VERN WRIGHT, JUNE WRIGHT, and SUPERANTENNA CORPORATION, Plaintiffs, v…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 10, 2013

Citations

No. C 12-00746 WHA (N.D. Cal. May. 10, 2013)