From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wright v. Bloom

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 9, 2013
No. C 12-00746 WHA (N.D. Cal. May. 9, 2013)

Opinion

No. C 12-00746 WHA

05-09-2013

VERN WRIGHT, JUNE WRIGHT, and SUPERANTENNA CORPORATION, Plaintiffs, v. MICHAEL BLOOM, JAIMEE BLOOM, KINGSBRIDGE CORPORATION, OFFSHORE SOLUTIONS, INC., SINOTECH CORPORATION, DIFONA COMMUNICATION GMBH, BULLIVANT HOUSER BAILEY PC, and DOES 1-10, Defendants.


ORDER RE MOTION TO WITHDRAW

Counsel for Difona Communication GMBH's motion to withdraw as counsel is currently pending and is set for hearing on May 23 (Dkt. No. 109). As indicated by Docket Number 115, it appears that this action has settled and the settlement terms have been placed on the record. It would be a waste of resources to hold a hearing on the pending motion. Counsel is therefore urged to file a stipulation of dismissal in accord with the settlement no later than MAY 14, 2013. If none is filed by that time, the hearing shall go forward as scheduled.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

________________________

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Wright v. Bloom

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 9, 2013
No. C 12-00746 WHA (N.D. Cal. May. 9, 2013)
Case details for

Wright v. Bloom

Case Details

Full title:VERN WRIGHT, JUNE WRIGHT, and SUPERANTENNA CORPORATION, Plaintiffs, v…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 9, 2013

Citations

No. C 12-00746 WHA (N.D. Cal. May. 9, 2013)