From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wright v. Bearden

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 2, 2013
517 F. App'x 151 (4th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 12-7995

04-02-2013

ALLEN WRIGHT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DR. BEARDEN; DR. MOORE, Defendants - Appellees.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Allen Wright, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher R. Antley, DEVLIN & PARKINSON, PA, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. Terry L. Wooten, Chief District Judge. (1:11-cv-03307-TLW) Before NIEMEYER, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Allen Wright, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher R. Antley, DEVLIN & PARKINSON, PA, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Allen Wright appeals the district court's orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint, denying his motion for extension of time to file a notice of appeal, and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motions. Limiting our review to the issues raised in the informal brief, see 4th Cir. R. 34(b), we affirm the district court's orders. Wright v. Bearden, No. 1:11-cv-03307-TLW (D.S.C. Oct. 2, 2012; dated Nov. 2, 2012, entered Nov. 5, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Wright v. Bearden

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 2, 2013
517 F. App'x 151 (4th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

Wright v. Bearden

Case Details

Full title:ALLEN WRIGHT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DR. BEARDEN; DR. MOORE, Defendants…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 2, 2013

Citations

517 F. App'x 151 (4th Cir. 2013)