From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wright v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 4, 2013
Case No. ED CV 12-726 MRW (C.D. Cal. Feb. 4, 2013)

Summary

finding ALJ erred by not addressing medical records that underlaid treating physician's opinion and instead "incorrectly impl[ying] that the [opinion] was based on Plaintiff's subjective pain complaints."

Summary of this case from De Martinez v. Saul

Opinion

Case No. ED CV 12-726 MRW

02-04-2013

LAVON A. WRIGHT, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


JUDGMENT

It is the judgment of this Court that the decision of the Administrative Law Judge is VACATED, and the matter is REMANDED to the Social Security Administration for further proceedings consistent with the Court's Order.

_________________________________

HON. MICHAEL R. WILNER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Wright v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 4, 2013
Case No. ED CV 12-726 MRW (C.D. Cal. Feb. 4, 2013)

finding ALJ erred by not addressing medical records that underlaid treating physician's opinion and instead "incorrectly impl[ying] that the [opinion] was based on Plaintiff's subjective pain complaints."

Summary of this case from De Martinez v. Saul
Case details for

Wright v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:LAVON A. WRIGHT, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 4, 2013

Citations

Case No. ED CV 12-726 MRW (C.D. Cal. Feb. 4, 2013)

Citing Cases

De Martinez v. Saul

Other than this lone example, which is of dubious merit, the ALJ does not point to anything else in Dr.…