From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wright v. Adventures Rolling Cross Country, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 5, 2013
No. C-12-0982 EMC (N.D. Cal. Mar. 5, 2013)

Opinion

No. C-12-0982 EMC

03-05-2013

PETER WRIGHT, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ADVENTURES ROLLING CROSS COUNTRY, INC., et al., Defendants.


ORDER RE BRIEFING ON CROSS-

MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

As ordered by the Court, the parties filed their cross-motions for summary judgment on February 28, 2013. Because the cross-motions deal with the same issue i.e., whether ARCC is an organized camp -- the Court does not see the necessity of having the full briefing as originally ordered.

The Court shall permit the parties to file full opposition briefs but shall limit the parties' reply briefs. Each party shall file a reply brief no longer than seven (7) pages.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________

EDWARD M. CHEN

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Wright v. Adventures Rolling Cross Country, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 5, 2013
No. C-12-0982 EMC (N.D. Cal. Mar. 5, 2013)
Case details for

Wright v. Adventures Rolling Cross Country, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:PETER WRIGHT, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ADVENTURES ROLLING CROSS COUNTRY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 5, 2013

Citations

No. C-12-0982 EMC (N.D. Cal. Mar. 5, 2013)