From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wright-Porter v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jan 26, 2012
Case No. 11-10837 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 26, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 11-10837

01-26-2012

LYNN WRIGHT-PORTER, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Defendant.


HON. BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN

MAGISTRATE JUDGE MONA K. MAJZOUB


OPINION AND ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE

MAJZOUB'S JANUARY 10, 2012 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, GRANTING

DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING

PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

I. Introduction

This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majzoub's Report and Recommendation ("R and R") dated January 10, 2012, recommending that the Court grant Defendant's motion for summary judgment and deny Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment. Neither party filed an objection to the R and R.

This Court has had an opportunity to fully review this matter and the parties' filings, and believes that the Magistrate Judge has reached the correct conclusions for the proper reasons. Further, the Court hereby adopts pages 2-11 of the R and R, comprising the procedural and factual history of this matter, as though restated herein.

II. Analysis

Plaintiff Lynn Wright-Porter's complaint seeks judicial review of Defendant Commissioner of Social Security's determination that she is not entitled to social security benefits due to her impairments of depression/mental disorder, scoliosis, degenerative disc disease, and accompanying pain. The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment. Plaintiff did not respond to Defendant's motion.

The Court has reviewed the cross-motions, as well as the R and R. The Court finds that the conclusion contained within the R and R that the ALJ properly addressed the treating source's opinion and did not need to discuss Plaintiff's husband's statement, and that substantial evidence supports the decision denying Plaintiff her disability benefits, is correct.

III. Order

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majzoub's Report and Recommendation dated January 10, 2012, is hereby accepted and adopted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.

Dated: January 26, 2012

Detroit, Michigan

BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Wright-Porter v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jan 26, 2012
Case No. 11-10837 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 26, 2012)
Case details for

Wright-Porter v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:LYNN WRIGHT-PORTER, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jan 26, 2012

Citations

Case No. 11-10837 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 26, 2012)