From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wright Mfg., Inc. v. Toro Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
May 12, 2015
2014-1534 (Fed. Cir. May. 12, 2015)

Opinion

2014-1534 2014-1558

05-12-2015

WRIGHT MANUFACTURING, INC., Appellant v. THE TORO COMPANY, Appellee

JOSEPH A. RHOA, Nixon & Vanderhye P.C., Arlington, VA, argued for appellant. RACHEL C. HUGHEY, Merchant & Gould P.C., Minneapolis, MN, argued for appellee. Also represented by ANTHONY RICHARD ZEULI, KATHERINE E. MULLER.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. 95/001,741, 95/001,442.

JUDGMENT

JOSEPH A. RHOA, Nixon & Vanderhye P.C., Arlington, VA, argued for appellant. RACHEL C. HUGHEY, Merchant & Gould P.C., Minneapolis, MN, argued for appellee. Also represented by ANTHONY RICHARD ZEULI, KATHERINE E. MULLER. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (REYNA, SCHALL, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT May 12, 2015

Date

/s/ Daniel E. O'Toole

Daniel E. O'Toole

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Wright Mfg., Inc. v. Toro Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
May 12, 2015
2014-1534 (Fed. Cir. May. 12, 2015)
Case details for

Wright Mfg., Inc. v. Toro Co.

Case Details

Full title:WRIGHT MANUFACTURING, INC., Appellant v. THE TORO COMPANY, Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: May 12, 2015

Citations

2014-1534 (Fed. Cir. May. 12, 2015)