Wright Med. Tech. v. Paragon 28, Inc.

Full title: WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC., Appellant v. PARAGON 28, INC., Appellee

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: Jan 4, 2022

No. 2021-1340 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 4, 2022)

Opinion

2021-1340 2021-1342 2021-1344 2021-1345

01-04-2022

WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC., Appellant v. PARAGON 28, INC., Appellee

Patrick D. McPherson, Duane Morris LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by Donald Joseph English, Patrick C. Muldoon; Samuel W. Apicelli, Philadelphia, PA; Pierre J. Hubert, Diana Sangalli, Austin, TX; Thomas W. Sankey, Houston, TX. Greg Matthew Polins, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for appellee. Also represented by Meredith Zinanni; Luke Dauchot, Sharre Lotfollahi, Los Angeles, CA.

PER CURIAM

This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2019-00894, IPR2019-00895, IPR2019-00896, IPR2019-00898.

Patrick D. McPherson, Duane Morris LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by Donald Joseph English, Patrick C. Muldoon; Samuel W. Apicelli, Philadelphia, PA; Pierre J. Hubert, Diana Sangalli, Austin, TX; Thomas W. Sankey, Houston, TX.

Greg Matthew Polins, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for appellee. Also represented by Meredith Zinanni; Luke Dauchot, Sharre Lotfollahi, Los Angeles, CA. 1

JUDGMENT

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM

Newman, Dyk, and Hughes, Circuit Judges.

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. 2