Opinion
CIVIL ACTION NO. H-09-1145.
November 9, 2009
ORDER
The parties have moved for entry of a protective order. There is one aspect of the protective order that gives rise to concern. Paragraph 8 states that a party submitting designated confidential information to the court must do so by filing under seal. But designating a document as confidential in discovery is not sufficient to maintain it under seal. That paragraph should be revised to provide that either with the sealed filing or within a certain period thereafter, the party seeking to maintain the seal must file a separate motion with the court showing good cause to do so.
A revised protective order consistent with this order must be filed by November 20, 2009 or the parties may file a response showing why no revision is appropriate.