From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wrice v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
May 26, 2009
283 S.W.3d 314 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009)

Opinion

No. ED91453.

May 26, 2009.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Philip J. Heagney, Judge.

Lisa M. Stroup, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Jamie Pamela Rasmussen, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.



ORDER


Movant, Bryan Wrice, appeals from a judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Wrice v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
May 26, 2009
283 S.W.3d 314 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009)
Case details for

Wrice v. State

Case Details

Full title:Bryan WRICE, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: May 26, 2009

Citations

283 S.W.3d 314 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009)